{"id":6556,"date":"2013-10-26T08:15:42","date_gmt":"2013-10-26T12:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/?p=6556"},"modified":"2013-10-27T09:41:07","modified_gmt":"2013-10-27T13:41:07","slug":"year-4-month-10-day-26-take-good-care-of-yourself","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/year-4-month-10-day-26-take-good-care-of-yourself\/","title":{"rendered":"Year 4, Month 10, Day 26: Take Good Care Of Yourself"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Bangor Daily News runs a WaPo piece on the IPCC:<\/a><\/p>\n

If one body represents the international scientific consensus on global warming, it is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations panel that just released the first portion of its fifth authoritative report on the science.<\/p>\n

The report\u2019s headline finding is that \u201cit is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not just that the planet has warmed over the course of many decades, during which people have released massive amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Among many other things, there is what scientists have called a \u201chuman fingerprint\u201d \u2014 a pattern of warming in the troposphere and cooling in the stratosphere that is very likely characteristic of human influence.<\/p>\n

The authors did not shrink from addressing one of the primary threads that critics have been pulling in their effort to unravel the scientific consensus \u2014 the recent flattening of global temperature rise.<\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This was the hook for some generic media criticism. October 16:<\/p>\n

News coverage of the newly issued report from the IPCC is all too often a “balanced” approach in which the opinion of a huge number of climate scientists is countered by the vague assertions of corporate spokespeople. <\/p>\n

To cut through the fog and clarify the discussion, we need to understand that scientific speech and writing is careful and rhetorically restrained, while that of our media is sloppy and profligate. Some pundits claim the report represents the views of “environmental extremists” and should therefore be discounted, but in fact, the IPCC’s consensus underestimates some threats and almost entirely omits others, such as melting Arctic methane; the document represents a very conservative assessment of our present level of risk.<\/p>\n

And as such, it deserves to be taken far more seriously \u2014 for if there is one phrase that we are seeing with accelerating frequency in news about Earth’s climate, it’s “more than expected.” Polar ice melt, oceanic acidification, species loss, extreme precipitation, wildfire severity \u2014 all of these phenomena are happening faster and more intensely than scientists’ predictions even a few years ago. By belittling the findings and expertise of climatologists, our media figures and politicians are endangering the health of our planet and the happiness of our posterity.<\/p>\n

Warren Senders<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Published.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Bangor Daily News runs a WaPo piece on the IPCC: If one body represents the international scientific consensus on global warming, it is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations panel that just released the first portion of its fifth authoritative report on the science. The report\u2019s headline finding is that \u201cit […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,44],"tags":[252,644,688,1032],"class_list":["post-6556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","category-politics","tag-ipcc","tag-media-irresponsibility","tag-scientific-consensus","tag-scientific-methodology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6556"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6784,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6556\/revisions\/6784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.warrensenders.com\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}